"Useless Land"

I recently stumbled across a blog--which is an unabashed cheerleader for unimpeded solar energy development--that criticized opposition to BrightSource Energy's Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, and labeled the Mojave Desert as "useless land" that was perfect for solar energy siting.  The blog obviously did not acknowledge the compromises that need to be made as we pursue renewable energy in California, let alone a basic understanding of the Mojave Desert environment.  Yes, some desert land will need to be developed with utility-scale solar.  But the Mojave is not devoid of life, and many Americans appreciate un-interrupted wilderness.  As for Ivanpah, science clearly shows that the site is significant for its unique desert tortoise population, and occurrences of rare desert plants.    While these counter-arguments are likely not news to regular readers of this blog, I had to overcome my initial shock and remind myself that the "useless land" argument is unfortunately one that can gain traction in much of the US, especially since solar energy's economic benefits are touted from Wall Street to the White House.

Comments

  1. MorongobillFebruary 24, 2010 at 7:21 PM

    I agree that the "useless land" argument might
    resonate if it is picked up by the policy makers pushing these projects- especially if it is parroted by all the talking heads allied with them.

    Those of us who love this Mojave desert and the Mojave National Preserve will just have to work that much harder to try to put our message out.

    That "useless land" argument can also work for us, especially if we have specific sites to offer up as alternatives.

    Thanks for your great work getting the word out with your site.

    Bill Mcdonald

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shaun G.February 25, 2010 at 3:27 PM

    Thanks Bill -- you're right that there could be a more organized means of identifying the "useless" or disturbed land to energy companies...giving them some help avoiding some of the best swaths of the Mojave.

    And thanks for the work on your blog! I just realized it didnt show up in the "blogs I'm following" list so I just updated that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anthony Dominguez Realtor land specialistSeptember 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM

    Well I hope we can all realize that we need renewable energy, and we need to protect the wild life that exists, as well. lets set our minds for a mutual responce and meaningful collaborations.

    I have clients that are able and willing to to sell thier approved mitigation habitats to help if need be. Sincerely, Anthony Dominguez Realtor, 760-524-7913

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Many Plants Species in the Desert?

Would you expect that California's desert hosts gives the redwood forest a run for its money when it comes to plant biodiversity?  It's easy to take the desert for granted when all you want to do is zoom through it on the highway and get to your destination. But you are passing by an amazing and biologically diverse ecosystem.  There are at least 2,450 native plant species found in California's desert, according to a great article by Chris Clarke on desert life , posted at KCET. If you want to learn more about our amazing deserts, join Desert Biodiversity, a new organization dedicated to exploring, respecting and defending the deserts.
Read more

Mowing Vegetation as Mitigation: Trump Administration Practice Goes Unchallenged

Image
The Trump administration is again touting the practice of mowing thousands of acres of desert vegetation as environmentally-responsible, despite a preponderance of evidence to the contrary.  The draft environmental review of the Yellow Pine Solar project in southern Nevada claims that vegetation mowing - as opposed to bulldozing - will yield positive outcomes that are highly doubtful.   This positive framing of the construction practice misleads the public and decisionmakers and ignores decades of scientific research regarding the impacts of mechanized disturbance on desert wildlands.  According to the draft environmental review: "Mowing is becoming the standard on large site-type ROWs to prevent permanent impairment of public lands (as mandated by FLPMA) and in lieu of off-site mitigation... Mowing methods are designed to help preserve soils, biological soil crusts, soil seed banks, native perennial vegetation diversity and structure, and cacti and yucca species, and to resist
Read more

The Absurdity of the Cadiz Water Export Scheme

Image
The Department of Interior this month reversed a policy to make it easier for the Cadiz company to pump billions of gallons of water from an ancient Mojave Desert aquifer - killing off natural springs that wildlife depend upon - to ship that water to the lush landscaping of Orange County.   Cadiz still has other hurdles in its way, but the company's tenacity and willingness to line the pockets of politicians could spell doom for Mojave wildlife. Cadiz Calls it Conservation The Cadiz company has a contract to export nearly 16.3 billion gallons (yes, that is billion with a 'b') a year for 50 years from the Mojave to the Santa Margarita Water District ( SMWD ) in Orange County.  The Cadiz company claims that it will only pump water that would otherwise evaporate from a dry lake bed and that the aquifer will naturally recharge from rainfall, leaving no significant impacts on wildlife or groundwater levels.  According to Cadiz propaganda, this isn't a water export sche
Read more